FAQs

Infrastructure

• How will highways be affected? Who will pay for improving them?

  Currently, Solano’s highways can be congested because more than half of our residents have to commute out of Solano County for work. The best way to take traffic off I-80, Highway 37, Highway 12, and Highway 113 is to prevent those trips in the first place – by bringing jobs to Solano County, which is exactly what we’re doing.

  Leveraging the California Forever project to make Solano a bigger center for jobs will make it possible for people who live in Solano County to have a much shorter commute. Often, those Solano residents will be able to take advantage of the reverse commute direction where there’s little congestion.

  For example, people commuting from Fairfield or Suisun City to the new city will be going east on Highway 12 in the morning – when all the traffic on Highway 12 is going west. Each of those trips mean one less trip on I-80, Highway 37, Highway 12, and Highway 113, in the peak direction, which will help alleviate congestion.

  To be clear, over time, Highway 12 and Highway 113 will still need to be upgraded and widened – and this project is by far the best chance to do that.

  To pay for those upgrades, Solano Transportation Authority has existing programs in place under which developers contribute towards the costs of improving highways impacted by their projects. We will contribute more than that amount towards the cost of improving highways.

  For the remaining costs, we will work with the state and federal governments on ways to finance improvements to the highways. But in no event would any balance of the funds be paid by other Solano County residents or cities.

  Transportation projects generally get funded by state and federal grants, not by counties. Highway money is already being spent by California and the federal government. But Solano County is not getting its fair share. We will use our contribution of the costs as the basis to get matching funds from the state and federal governments, so this will not cost Solano taxpayers any additional money, or take away from other projects in Solano.

  California Forever will provide a net increase to the tax base of the county, benefitting current residents in all cities of Solano County.

  • Share
  • 
  • 
  • 
  • Copied!

• Where will the new city get its water?

  First and foremost, before any construction can begin, as part of the Environmental Impact Report approval process, we must prove that we have sufficient water supply through the rigorous, state-mandated process of Water Supply Assessment and Water Supply Verification. This process is regulated by the State of California, and requires us to prove that we have rights to actual water we can deliver to households and employers in the new community, for decades going forward, including during drought periods, without interfering with water supplies that others rely on.

  Second, our team of leading industry experts has determined that the 13,700-16,400 acre-feet per year of water currently used on our holdings is more than the 12,600 acre-feet per year required to supply water for the initial build out of the new city to 100,000 residents, including all associated industrial, commercial, and other uses. Put simply, we already have enough water for all employers and residents who may move in between now and mid 2040s. 

  For the balance of our water, our team is still working to confirm how much additional water is available based on our existing uses. We will then layer that with water purchases from outside of Solano County.

  To read more about our water plan, please read this post, which also details our plan for conjunctive water use, highest water efficiency, and use of recycled water for landscaping and industrial, non-potable uses.

  • Share
  • 
  • 
  • 
  • Copied!

• What about fire risk?

  State law requires that moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones be identified by the State and each County. No part of the entire area between Fairfield and Rio Vista has been designated as moderate, high, or very high fire zone in the current Solano County fire hazard severity zone map.

  This is largely because there are no forests in the area, which means that wildfires that happen are grass fires – which are much easier to control, due to the low combustible load and easy access to fight the fire.

  Any approved project will provide new fire protection services, including state of the art equipment and new fire response personnel to meet all applicable fire protection standards for the project and other communities in the county.

  For more information, you can also read our longer post about sustainability and resilience.

  • Share
  • 
  • 
  • 
  • Copied!

• Is it OK to build solar farms close to Travis AFB?

  Short answer – absolutely, it is supported by the Air Force, and there are dozens of major solar installations near other Air Force Bases, including Luke (Arizona), Davis-Monthan (Arizona), Nellis (Nevada), Eglin (Florida), and Robins (Georgia). For longer answer, read on.

  Solar installations near Air Force Bases

  “The increased risks driven by climate change cannot be addressed by emission reductions in the Air Force alone, but the Department of the Air Force will be part of the solution. Improving energy efficiency and deploying advanced energy technologies will not only decrease emissions but will help mitigate combat risk and increase operational capability.”

  Department of the Air Force Climate Action Plan, 2022

  Military investments into renewables have risen significantly in the last two decades. DoD spending on clean energy is projected to surpass $10 billion annually by 2030—25 times greater than the $400 million spent on clean energy investments in the early 2000’s—and the Air Force is now the largest clean energy purchaser of any federal entity. Earlier this year, the Department of Defense (DoD) was awarded an additional $55 million in federal grants for initiatives aimed at improving energy resilience and efficiency.

  Solar farms can reduce energy users’ dependence on the grid, keeping power on even during blackouts. They also reduce strain on the grid by shifting demand to off-grid clean energy, making the grid more reliable and resilient—and significantly improving air quality—for everyone.

  Operating solar farms on or near airport runways is common and safe. Airport operators have long operated on-site solar farms to create sustainable sources of clean, low-cost energy to power terminals, hangars, temperature, lighting, and more. Sometimes, concerns have been raised about glare, but solar panels are coated to absorb light, which helps minimize any potential glare. As a result, they generate a similar level of glare as things like lakes and parking lots.

  A mix of rooftop and ground-mounted arrays help power many civilian airports, including Denver, Indianapolis, O’Hare and San Francisco International Airports. Tallahassee International, for example, currently operates a 62 MW facility across nearly 400 acres, about 700 feet from its runway.

  In 2021, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) formally recognized these facts and established policy for solar energy system projects and safety, which in part stated that “in most cases, the glint and glare from solar energy systems to pilots on final approach is similar to glint and glare pilots routinely experience from water bodies, glass-façade buildings, parking lots, and similar features.”

  As long as glare impact analysis is conducted to inform safe configuration of the panels, an airport solar facility may present a level of risk similar to that of a river, lake, or coastline near the airport. Building on the 2021 policy, last year, the FAA committed $92 million in grants to 21 airports for solar and other sustainability investments to help airports reach net-zero emissions by 2050.

  Solar installations by California Forever

  California Forever has proposed building solar farms on lands it owns near Travis AFB. Any such installations would require approval from Travis to ensure the technology, location, and design for any solar farm is acceptable. Planning will include a glare study and possibly adjusting panel orientation to minimize potential impacts.

  With all necessary steps taken, solar projects can be compatible with airport operations and create beneficial use of land that has otherwise limited uses due to noise, airspace, or other operational concerns. We are committed to working with Travis to ensure any proposals meet requirements to protect ongoing base operations while furthering a critical clean energy transition. We are also excited to explore building solar farms on our land whose output is dedicated for use by Travis AFB, thereby helping the base’s sustainability and resilience goals.

  Travis AFB has recognized the compatibility of our plans, including the solar farms proposed there, with flying its full mission in the statement published on its website on February 15, 2024, where Travis AFB stated:

  “California Forever made significant changes to its plans in order to protect Travis’ global mission and local flight operations. With this revised proposal, Travis AFB will be able to continue flying its full mission, including all of our operational, exercise, and local training flights consisting of multiple patterns and landings to all runways, including night vision goggle training to the assault landing zone (ALZ) runway. Travis AFB recognizes California Forever’s efforts to minimize impacts to operations and mission capabilities, as well as their project’s potential to improve the wellbeing of our Airmen and families into the future.”

  Examples of solar near military airports across America

  Many military airports successfully operate solar farms. Most notably, last year, Edwards AFB in California opened a 1,300-MW system—the largest project of its kind in US Air Force history, as well as the largest private-public collaboration in DoD history. The nearly two-million panel facility is estimated to power over 238,000 homes and annually save over 320,000 tons of emissions.

  There are many other examples of solar farms built near our Air Force Bases. Here are just some of those other examples:

  1. Luke AFB in Arizona operates a 10 MW solar farm on 105 acres immediately adjacent to their airfield.
  2. Davis-Monthan AFB in Arizona provides 16.4 MW of solar power across 170 acres approximately 1,000 feet from their airfield.
  3. Across two solar farms, Nellis AFB in Nevada provides about 33 MW over 242 acres approximately one mile from its airfield.
  4. Eglin AFB in Florida operates a 30 MW solar farm across 240 acres about one mile north of their airfield.
  5. Robins AFB in Georgia produces 128 MW of power across 650 acres approximately 1.5 miles from its airfield.

  • Share
  • 
  • 
  • 
  • Copied!